We previously reported on the viability of the “implied certification” theory of FCA liability based on oral argument before the Supreme Court in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. U.S. ex rel. Escobar. We concluded that the theory—under which a claim for payment can be false without an express certification, but because the government contractor has not complied with an applicable statute, regulation, or contractual provision—did not appear to be headed for extinction. It turns out we were right.
Continue Reading FCA’s “Implied Certification” Theory Survives
About
Barbara Taylor is a Special Counsel in the Government Contracts, Investigations & International Trade Practice Group in the firm's Los Angeles office.
Latest Post
More Posts
FCA’s “Implied Certification” Theory Survives
Did the FCA’s “Implied Certification” Theory Dodge a Bullet?
Did the FCA’s “Implied Certification” Theory Dodge a Bullet?
Did the FCA’s “Implied Certification” Theory Dodge a Bullet?
You Again?: Application of the First-to-File Bar Where Subsequent Actions Are Brought By the Same Relator
Cloudy Skies Ahead for Providers? CMS’ Release of Medicare Billing Data Combined with Physician Payment Sunshine Act Data May Boost Fraud Litigation
Cloudy Skies Ahead for Providers? CMS’ Release of Medicare Billing Data Combined with Physician Payment Sunshine Act Data May Boost Fraud Litigation
Potential Risks of Healthcare Joint Ventures Between Insurance Companies and Hospitals
How Are Your Physicians Compensated? Stark Law + False Claims Act = Halifax Paying $85 Million
How Are Your Physicians Compensated? Stark Law + False Claims Act = Halifax Paying $85 Million
Update on the Provider Self-Disclosure Protocol
Navigating the Provider Self-Disclosure Protocol
About
Barbara Taylor is a Special Counsel in the Government Contracts, Investigations & International Trade Practice Group in the firm's Los Angeles office.