In Ap-Fonden v. Activision Blizzard, Inc., C.A. No. 2022-1001-KSJM, 2024 WL 863290 (Del. Ch. Feb. 29, 2024), the Delaware Court of Chancery (McCormick, C.) declined to dismiss a claim alleging that the Board of Directors of defendant Activision Blizzard, Inc. (“Activision”) violated Section 251(b) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) by approving a draft merger agreement between Activision and Microsoft, Inc. (“Microsoft”) that was not sufficiently final. The Court held that to comply with Section 251(b), the version of a merger agreement the board must consider and approve need not be “execution ready” but must be “essentially complete.” Practitioners should pay close attention to the Court’s holdings here as it may vary from what some consider customary market practice.
About
Eugene Choi is an associate in the Corporate Practice Group in the firm's Orange County office.
Latest Post
More Posts
The Delaware Court of Chancery Confirms that Duty of Oversight Claims Against Corporate Officers Are Subject to the Same High Pleading Standards Applicable to Duty of Oversight Claims Against Corporate Directors
Delaware Court of Chancery Clarifies Heightened Standard for Recovery of Attorneys’ Fees in Disclosure-Based Deal Litigation
Protecting Privilege in Case of a Dispute with Former Director
Delaware Court of Chancery Holds that Officers of a Delaware Corporation Are Subject to Fiduciary Duty of Oversight
Delaware Supreme Court Holds Novel Pre-Closing Dividend Transaction Structure Does Not Thwart Appraisal Remedy
Delaware Supreme Court Shines Spotlight on Boilerplate Purchase Agreement Provisions
Delaware Supreme Court Adopts New Three-Prong Test for Demand Futility
Delaware Supreme Court Affirms the Use of Stockholders Agreements to Waive Appraisal Rights
Delaware Court of Chancery Decision Provides Guidance on M&A Earnouts
About
Eugene Choi is an associate in the Corporate Practice Group in the firm's Orange County office.
Connect: https://www.sheppardmullin.com/echoi
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS