In Lawson v. PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc., __ P.3d __, 2022 WL 244731 (Cal., Jan. 27, 2022), the California Supreme Court clarified that whistleblower retaliation claims brought under Labor Code section 1102.5 should not be evaluated under the McDonnell Douglas test, but instead the standard enumerated in Labor Code section 1102.6. Under the section 1102.6 standard, a plaintiff must show that a protected activity was a contributing factor in a prohibited action against the employee by a preponderance of the evidence. The employer must then demonstrate with clear and convincing evidence that the action would have occurred for legitimate, independent reasons, even if the employee had not engaged in protected action.
Continue Reading California Supreme Court Holds That McDonnell Douglas Standard Should Not Be Used When Evaluating Whistleblower Retaliation Claims
About
Elyssa Sternberg is an associate in the Labor and Employment Practice Group in the firm's Los Angeles office.
Latest Post
More Posts
California Employers Should Be Aware of Updates to Leave Requirements
States May Have Additional Layoff Notice Requirements Under “Mini-WARN” Statutes
First Day on the Job and on Notice: When the Statute of Limitations Begins for Employer Background Checks
About
Elyssa Sternberg is an associate in the Labor and Employment Practice Group in the firm's Los Angeles office.