In its latest Covid-era coverage case, John’s Grill, Inc. v. Hartford Financial Services, Group, Inc., the California Supreme Court held that an insured cannot use the “illusory coverage doctrine to transform the policy’s limited virus-related coverage into unlimited virus-related coverage.” In so holding, the Court reiterated the long-standing rule that “explicit and unambiguous policy limitations” will be enforced as written.
About
Jordan Derringer is a special counsel in the Business Trial Practice Group in the firm's San Diego office.
Latest Post
More Posts
Attorney Challenging First-Party Diminution of Value Claims Sanctioned by Ninth Circuit
A Primer on When a Cause of Action Accrues for Statute of Limitations Purposes
Ninth Circuit Confirms that the Two-Year Statute of Limitations in a Bad Faith UM/UIM Claim Begins when the Insured Should Have Known About the Insurer’s Alleged Bad Faith Acts
New Time-Limited Settlement Demand Laws Need Testing in Court
New Time-Limited Settlement Demand Laws Need Testing in Court
New California Law Impacts “Time-Limited Demands” in the Insurance Industry
New California Law Impacts “Time-Limited Demands” in the Insurance Industry
Yahoo Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pitts.: Revisiting the Rules of Policy Interpretation
Yahoo Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pitts.: Revisiting the Rules of Policy Interpretation
Negligence is Not Enough/Set-Up Tactics are Disfavored
About
Jordan Derringer is a special counsel in the Business Trial Practice Group in the firm's San Diego office.
Blogs