On June 27, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed Idaho v. United States on procedural grounds and sent the case back to the Ninth Circuit. By doing so, the Supreme Court reinstated the preliminary injunction issued by the district court and temporarily allows abortions to be performed when necessary to preserve the health of the pregnant woman. Mike Moyle, et al., v. United States, No. 23-726, and Idaho v. United States, No. 23-727. However, by failing to rule on the merits of the case and the core question of whether the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) preempts Idaho law, confusion and uncertainty are likely to continue for healthcare providers and hospitals seeking to provide care for pregnant women.
About
Megan Miller is an associate in the Corporate Practice Group in the firm's Dallas office.
Latest Post
More Posts
EMTALA: In the Spotlight
HHS & DOJ FY 2022 Enforcement Targeted Fraud in COVID-19, Telemedicine, Opioid and Prescription Drugs, and Substance Use Treatment Centers, Among Other Initiatives
Increased Enforcement in Healthcare? DOJ to Add More Prosecutors
About
Megan Miller is an associate in the Corporate Practice Group in the firm's Dallas office.