On August 1, 2024, the California Supreme Court issued a decision in Turrieta v. Lyft that substantially narrows the authority of PAGA litigants to intervene in overlapping PAGA actions. The Supreme Court’s ruling confirms that the courts and the Labor & Workforce Development Agency (“LWDA”) – and not competing PAGA litigants – have primary responsibility for providing oversight of PAGA settlements.
About
Thomas Kaufman is a partner in the Labor & Employment Practice Group in the firm's Century City office.
Latest Post
More Posts
New California Law Prohibits Automatic Stay of Trial Court Action When Appealing Denial of a Motion to Compel Arbitration
Supreme Court Grants Review in Important Arbitration Case Regarding PAGA
Ninth Circuit Reversed Grubhub’s Victory on Independent Contractor Classification in Light of the Retroactive Application of Dynamex
Manageability – a New Weapon to Stave Off Unmanageable PAGA Claims
California Supreme Court Announces New Standard That Meal and Rest Period Premiums Must Be Paid at Same “Regular Rate of Pay” Used to Calculate Overtime Payments
California Appellate Court Clarifies the Monetary Amount for Meal Period, Rest Break, and Recovery Period Premiums, and Affirms an Employer’s Neutral Rounding Policy
U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Individualized Arbitration Where Agreement Is Ambiguous on Issue of Class Arbitration
Ward v. Tilly’s, Inc.: California Employers Should Dial Back On-Call Shift Policies
California Court Reaffirms And Extends Rounding Rules
Court Of Appeal Holds That Claims To Recover Wages Under Labor Code Section 558 Brought Through The Private Attorneys General Act May Be Arbitrated
California Supreme Court Reaffirms Broad Right to Discovery in PAGA Actions
Ninth Circuit Invalidates Arbitration Agreement
U.S. Supreme Court’s Tyson Foods v. Bouaphakeo Opinion Reaffirms The Importance Of Challenging Plaintiff’s Experts In Class Actions
Brinker for Dummies
About
Thomas Kaufman is a partner in the Labor & Employment Practice Group in the firm's Century City office.