An Indiana appellate court recently declined to enforce an executive’s non-compete on the grounds that the covenant’s activity restriction was overbroad.
About
Umar Sattar is an associate in the Labor and Employment Practice Group in the firm's Chicago office.
Latest Post
More Posts
Will the Trump Labor Department Continue the Current Sharp Focus on the Healthcare Industry?
In With the “Old,” Out With the “New”: Second Trump Administration Will Usher in Significant Changes at the EEOC, DOL and NLRB
Buyer Beware: Delaware Courts Continue to Refuse to Enforce Deal-Based Non-Competes
We Can Now Add Civility and Secrecy to the List of Things Money Can’t Buy: NLRB Rules Non-Disparagement and Confidentiality Clauses in Severance Agreements Unlawfully Restrain and Coerce Employees
Illinois Supreme Court Rules All BIPA Claims Are Subject to Five-Year Time Limit
Buyer Beware: Delaware Declines to Enforce Sale of Business Non-Compete
Buyer Beware: Delaware Declines to Enforce Sale of Business Non-Compete
Buyer Beware: Tenth Circuit Issues Decision Emphasizing Critical Need for Employment Diligence
Colorado’s New Restrictive Covenant Law Now Effective
Illinois Governor Signs Non-Compete Legislation
Governor Signs Sweeping Changes to Illinois Employment Laws
About
Umar Sattar is an associate in the Labor and Employment Practice Group in the firm's Chicago office.